What is karma? Quantifying online influence and credibility

نویسندگان

  • Thomas Dimson
  • Milind Ganjoo
چکیده

Many online communities explicitly publicize the concept of karma or reputation for users, computed as a sum of positive votes by other members of the community. These explicit measures are often seen as proxies for more intangible notions such as influence (the ability of a member to persuade others) and credibility (the trustworthiness of the user as an member of the community). In this paper, we describe the range of network characteristics, interactions, and temporal factors that affect the accumulation of karma points. In order to confirm our intuitions about influential network characteristics, we evaluate our features on datasets that contain an explicit measure of karma. However, our primary motivation in developing a model that enables generalization to private communities without a concept of “voting” for users but with an implied network structure. For example, our findings can be applied to e-mail interaction graphs to determine a private “karma” score for members of an organization, and to subsequently identify users who have high influence and credibility. Our paper is organized as follows: we begin by describing prior studies of interaction networks in Section 2. Afterwards, we discuss our collection of data from two disparate online communities: Hacker News and Super User, and the conversion into an interaction graph structure. In Section 4 we examine different properties of these networks and how they relate to karma and reputation. Using our results, we train classifiers in Section 5 that are able to identify high-karma individuals with an improvement over our baseline measure. Finally, we conclude with future directions of research in Section 6.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics

Networked digital media present new challenges for people to locate information that they can trust. At the same time, societal reliance on information that is available solely or primarily via the Internet is increasing. This article discusses how and why digitally networked communication environments alter traditional notions of trust, and presents research that examines how information consu...

متن کامل

The effect of aesthetics on web credibility

Credibility influences a user’s interest in a web site. Once users perceive the credibility of a web site they will be more likely to use it. A combination of factors affects such credibility – such as the provider, content, aesthetics, accessibility and solution of technical problems. The aesthetics of a web site can affect a user’s first impressions of credibility. Experiments have shown that...

متن کامل

Exploring Online News Credibility: The Relative Influence of Traditional and Technological Factors

This study investigates a range of traditional and technological factors that contribute to credibility perceptions for three categories of online news sources. These sources include mainstream (usatoday.com, nytimes.com), independent (thedrudgereport.com, axisoflogic.com), and index-type (news.google.com, yahoo.news.com) websites. While traditional dimensions of credibility remain influential,...

متن کامل

Investigating Electronic Word-of-Mouth Effects on Online Discussion Forums: The Role of Perceived Positive Electronic Word-of-Mouth Review Credibility

Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) has been an important factor influencing consumer purchase decisions. Using the ABC model of attitude, this study proposes a model to explain how eWOM affects online discussion forums. Specifically, we propose that platform (Web site reputation and source credibility) and customer (obtaining buying-related information and social orientation through information) f...

متن کامل

Is This Opinion Leader’s Review Useful? Peripheral Cues for Online Review Helpfulness

With the growing popularity of online user-generated reviews, research has emerged to understand the mechanism of how a review is voted helpful, focusing on the central-route influences of review content and quality, yet little research has studied the roles of peripheral cues such as reviewer credibility and contextual factors. Drawing on the theories of elaboration likelihood model and source...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013